Aug 12, · Counter-terrorism is a combination of practices, strategies, techniques and practices that the various governments, police departments and the military service units use to stop terrorism acts with both the response to completed acts and the detection of potential terror acts included in blogger.comted Reading Time: 14 mins PERSPECTIVES ON TERRORISM Volume 11, Issue 4 Academic Theses (Ph.D. and MA) on Terrorism and Counter-Terrorism Related Issues, written in English between and Compiled and Selected by Ryan Scrivens Introduction This bibliography contains doctoral dissertations (Ph.D.) and Master (MA) Theses on issues relating to terrorism and counter-terrorism Dec 10, · D. Proactive Counter-Terrorism. The threat of terror has merged internal and external security concerns in a way that resulted with the mandates of domestic law enforcement, intelligence agencies, and customs officials to blend altogether around the issue of tracking the movement of people, materials and financial blogger.comted Reading Time: 10 mins
Counter Terrorism Dissertation
What is counterterrorism? Why is it important to understand the motivations behind terrorism efforts? What kind of general motives might you find among terrorists in this country and abroad?
Counter-terrorism is a combination of practices, strategies, techniques and practices that the various governments, police departments and the military service units use to stop terrorism acts with both the response to completed acts and the detection of potential terror acts included in counter-terrorism. The techniques and practices used in counter-terrorism aim at preventing or stopping certain terrorism acts, with the strategies usually offensive counter terrorism dissertation operation.
One major reason why the motivations behind terrorism efforts need to be understood is its great role in the development and implementation of effective counter-terrorism strategies. Since counter-terrorism measures depend on the nature of the terrorism act being mitigated, it is vital to identify how and why certain terrorism act is undertaken in order to also combat it successfully, counter terrorism dissertation.
Hire a subject expert to help you with Counter-terrorism. Understanding the motivation behind terrorism efforts forms the counter terrorism dissertation for the development of an effective countering action where lack of a clear understanding of all the issues surrounding a terror act, makes the possibility of curbing the act properly and effectively almost impossible Bolz.
F et al. In addition, understanding the motive behind terrorism counter terrorism dissertation allows the appropriate government organizations to select amongst the many, an effective action to counter a terrorism act that seems like an isolated event, counter terrorism dissertation.
This kind of understanding promotes good intelligence which forms a very vital component of preparing an effective counter-terrorism strategy.
Another reason why identification of terrorist motives is vital is the huge role it plays in hunting down hard-core terrorist. This makes it possible for the terrorists to be referred to as criminals, counter terrorism dissertation, making it easy to hunt terrorists according to the law and with popular support.
When a government or an organization plans and implements a counter-terrorism strategy, counter terrorism dissertation, there is need to understand how terrorism efforts violate the human rights. et al. In the USA, Some of the general motives that might be found in terrorists include, political motives, fighting for the injustice of a given group of people, economic superiority as well as the creation of fear and a sense of insecurity in the American citizens.
When they view themselves as the underserved underdogs on a mission, the terrorists use the strategy of using the weak to weaken the strong and to strengthen the weak. Is counterterrorism a tactic of warfare or crime-fighting? What role does due process play in either context? Counterterrorism can be used as both a warfare tactic or as a crime fighting tactic.
However, in the United States counterterrorism is usually used as a crime- fighting tactic, counter terrorism dissertation. For instance, the computer and the Internet are used to undertake warfare actions through the cyber space, counter terrorism dissertation.
Counter terrorism counter terrorism dissertation a warfare tactic is then used and can be used to stop people from using terrorism tactics against a given nation or organization. In such a case, comprehensive tools can be counter terrorism dissertation to deal with possible terrorist incidents and can further be used to repulse attacks that have been directed against a nation.
As a crime fighting tactic, counter terrorism is used by the law enforcement authorities to hunt down terrorists who have been labeled as criminals, counter terrorism dissertation. The authorities normally cut off hard-core terrorists from external sources of supply so as to label terrorists as criminals, and then use the law to easily hunt the terrorists down Combs. For example, it leads to the recruitment of more followers in the terrorist organizations because those who are recruited have developed great desire to become fighters against their enemy.
It further encourages terrorism behavior of solidarity, loyalty and self protection even when the group faces difficult times. In addition, the organization lacks the popular support to hunt down the terrorists Crank.
J et al., counter terrorism dissertation. The terrorists cannot be tracked down in pursuit of justice which makes it difficult to use force against hard-core terrorists with the use of brutal force generating more terrorism and terrorists. Are these changes potentially problematic for civil liberties in any way in the United States? Should law enforcement be permitted to use all technological resources available to accomplish its mission including in the fight against terror?
Are there limits? Traditionally, counterterrorism strategies and techniques against terror acts were hugely the responsibility of the military force, and the level of surveillance not as intensive as it is in the new strategies of surveillance. Counter terrorism dissertation major reason for this is that in the past, terrorism acts were not as many as they are in the modern world, counter terrorism dissertation. Traditional institutions approved surveillance only when it was seriously necessary to do so, counter terrorism dissertation, as compared to new surveillance which has been blamed for overstepping the bounders.
The ever increasing terrorist attacks against certain states in the world have demanded the development of many and effect counter terrorism measures through surveillance, in comparison to the traditional surveillance. In new surveillance, building of the counterterrorism plans has integrated all the segments of the society or government agencies. New surveillance has seen the development of counterterrorism strategies that have increased both the standard of the police as well as domestic intelligence.
While traditional surveillance involved the interception of communication and tracing of the suspected terrorists, new surveillance has expanded its ways of operation due to the advancement in technology. For instance, new surveillance has managed to expand the range of both the law and the military enforcement operations. The direction of domestic intelligence at specific groups that is based on origin and religion is a feature of the new surveillance, counter terrorism dissertation.
Mass surveillance is also done in new surveillance where an entire population is investigated. In the United States, changes in the surveillance have raised concerns based on the civil liberties. One good example is the mass surveillance which involves the surveillance of an entire population, an issue that has been objected since it is considered to defy civil liberty of the citizens.
For instance, counter terrorism dissertation, use of a network of secret police informers is considered a new surveillance abuse. Further allegations that the government has conducted electronic surveillances of domestic phone calls without warrants are an issue that has been said to go against the civil counter terrorism dissertation. However, the law enforcement organizations should not be fully allowed to use technological resources to fight terror.
This is because uncontrolled use consequently may result to severe negative effects. For instance, there have been some instances where technological measures against terror have resulted to the abuse and violation of the human rights. The return and extradition of people within countries and restriction of freedom of citizens are some of the examples that violate human rights during the process of counter terrorism dissertation. Lack of a boundary within which technology can be used poses a great risk, where the authorities may undertake counterterrorism practices while they violate the human rights at the same time, counter terrorism dissertation.
What is the FISA court? Explain how it works. What authorities can it grant law enforcement? How is it different from traditional courts? What concerns exist about expanding the use of FISA? A FISA court refers to a secret court in the USA that has the responsibility of approving the wiretaps that target the terrorists. It was established and has been working since to ensure that terrorists and foreign agents are monitored.
The FISA court was counter terrorism dissertation under the US Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. The court has approved domestic wiretaps and has continued to handle very sensitive domestic wiretaps in the US national security investigations. The FISA court operates through a process that is based on probable cause. An application to a FISA court judge is normally made by the FBI Federal Bureau of Investigation if it believes that it can counter terrorism dissertation probable cause that the target of the surveillance is either a suspected terrorist or a foreign agent.
The application is then forwarded to the FISA court and presented to a federal judge. There are 10 federal judges in the FISA court who sit on the court on a rotating basis.
The FISA court grants authority to the law enforcement authorities based on the probable cause presented to them. It gives warrant to the authorities to conduct surveillance on a suspected target, counter terrorism dissertation, if enough evidence is provided in the court to justify why a suspect should be surveyed. It receives an application if the FBI director certifies that there is need to obtain information above the normal investigative tactics, counter terrorism dissertation.
Clear indication of facts about the target of surveillance is also demanded by the FISA court before they give the authority and the judges often demand for more details about the targeted communication to authorize or approve a wiretap. It maintains a high rate of secrecy where a judge can make an ultimate decision to approve a wiretap.
The FISA court is different from the traditional court in its secret nature of operation where the court makes approval of the applications in counter terrorism dissertation. Unlike in the traditional courts, the FISA court evidence can be used in criminal trials after the expansion as compared to the traditional courts where the evidence could only be collected and stockpiled only for intelligence purposes.
The FISA court has expanded powers and it has the authority to allow both the electronic and physical searches due to its expanded powers. The expansion of using the FISA court in the USA has raised great concern. Another great concern is the fact that, it promotes surveillance that defies people of their liberty.
For instance, the expansion of the FISA court has made it able to give legal authority to approve black-bag operations, that authorize the Department of Justice to conduct both electronic and physical searches without an open court warrant. Furthermore, the subjects are not notified and an inventory of seized items not provided. Sometimes the surveillance allowed by the FISA court is considered to be unconstitutional.
The Civil liberty lawyers in the United States have stated that some searches that have been conducted are unconstitutional. It is a great worry that under the FISA court cover of secrecy, the court is likely to exceed its own broad legal mandate. For instance, the US government may attempt and fail under the traditional constitutional argument to secure a search warrant, but it would go to FISA court and secure approval for a search by converting the case into a national security investigation.
How has aviation security changed since ? What were the provision of the Aviation and Transportation Act? Did this Act change Aviation security in a dramatic way?
What role does racial and religious profiling play in securing the aviation industry and its consumers? What role should it play? The federal agencies concerned with transport security were transferred to the Department of Homeland security. This saw the creation of the TSA Transportation Security Administration within the DOT Department of Transportation.
The Act permits the existing authorities to permit the TSA to flexibly manage and deploy the workforce to carry out important security work where the national security is concerned, counter terrorism dissertation. The act mandates the increase in the number of federal air marshals and has placed the US airport security screeners under federal control. All the screeners were required to be US citizens, though the provision was later changed by American Civil Liberties Union.
Checks for baggage in the airports was made necessary with screening recommended by use of explosive detection machinery or manual methods. The Act allowed the Transportation Secretary to authorize airports to use all the necessary equipment for the chemical and biological weapons detection. The Act did change the aviation security dramatically.
After the creation of the Act, the civil aviation security was put under the Transportation Security Administration TSA. There were also changes in the federal statutes that covered aviation security contained in title 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations Chapter XII.
The provisions that were made by the Act changed security practices in counter terrorism dissertation airports with the airports implementing changes in the checking and screening procedures, where tight security procedures were and are still being developed.
Counter Terrorism Policy in France
, time: 13:16
PERSPECTIVES ON TERRORISM Volume 11, Issue 4 Academic Theses (Ph.D. and MA) on Terrorism and Counter-Terrorism Related Issues, written in English between and Compiled and Selected by Ryan Scrivens Introduction This bibliography contains doctoral dissertations (Ph.D.) and Master (MA) Theses on issues relating to terrorism and counter-terrorism Aug 12, · Counter-terrorism is a combination of practices, strategies, techniques and practices that the various governments, police departments and the military service units use to stop terrorism acts with both the response to completed acts and the detection of potential terror acts included in blogger.comted Reading Time: 14 mins Dec 10, · D. Proactive Counter-Terrorism. The threat of terror has merged internal and external security concerns in a way that resulted with the mandates of domestic law enforcement, intelligence agencies, and customs officials to blend altogether around the issue of tracking the movement of people, materials and financial blogger.comted Reading Time: 10 mins
No comments:
Post a Comment